Would you like to make this site your homepage? It's fast and easy...
Yes, Please make this my home page!
Question 85
Would you like to see more media exposure concerning atheism? If so, through
what medium and with what message?
- You bet I would! How about some positive coverage for a change? I'd like to see some more
focus on atheist issues, such as discrimination, prejudice, raising children in secular homes,
and other aspects of life. Magazine articles and television spots would certainly be
appreciated. (Anna #1490)
-
Sometimes 60 minutes comes across
as an atheist show. They have done some heavily anti-catholic stories such as the Magdelene
laundries in Ireland. In a story about a cancer treatment, they covered a religious lady who
died. A lot of shows would have cut that woman out of the segment and just covered religious
people who lived. Andy Rooney has criticized religion as well. (Michael Alexander #18)
- Yes, through music, particularly my own. ;) With the message that
you don't need fairy tales in your life to *live*... reality is quite exciting enough! (raven1
#1096)
- Sure, but not in a proselytizing sense. I don't know about the USA, but in the UK most
religious TV is of an incredibly low standard (with one or two notable exceptions) that seems
to specialise in the "warm fuzzies". (Therion Ware #422)
- Maybe documentaries/ docu-dramas about famous atheists/ non-theists on Network TV?
Atheists
Atheist Celebs (maff)
- I would like to see much, much more media attention concerning
atheism. I would like to see closet-celebrity-atheists and historical figures being "outed".
I would like to see politicians being *SHOCKED, SHOCKED* to find that so-and-so was an
(shudder) atheist. And so forth. Get it out into the open.
All media. (Red Foster)
- Not necessarily. I really think Newsgroups are the best place for atheism at this point.
I don't trust theists to remain non-violent if they sensed that atheism was a "threat." Which
is exactly what they would perceive if it were given more media coverage. Just here. (Occam's
Lazer)
- I kinda like the road sign idea myself. Large billboards alongside busy highways saying
"God is a myth". Stuff like that.
I like the satire idea also, of putting up side-by-side billboards, one with a pro-god message,
and one which mocks it. I got a kick out of someone's comment here a bit back about the sign
which says "Don't make me come down there - God" and a reply next to it saying "I dare you -
Man". LOL. (Elroy Willis)
- It's not so much the quantity as the quality of the exposure that worries me. Frankly, I
would prefer to see more *honest* exposure of both theism and atheism. Reporters and editors
seem to shy away from anything suggesting there are sound, rational alternatives to the
prevailing mythology.
But then, we live in a society in (the U.S.A.) in which the majority of adults are said to
believe in angels and the existence of some version of the cosmic super critter. I guess it's
unrealistic to expect the media to buck that trend.
I would like to see it happen, but I don't expect it, except through a medium like the Internet
- which is still relatively free and isn't *yet* under the control of either the government or
commercial advertisers. (George Ricker #232)
- I would like to see more balanced exposure.... and especially less of the media forcibly
dragging religion into the picture where it isn't relevant, such as in the aftermath of
tragedies. It seems harmless until you realize that the net effect is very unbalancing - look
at the media treatment of Klebold and Harris vs. that Cub Scout brat in Georgia or the kid did
the Jonesboro (I believe?) shooting, who both had their pastors prominently quoted as saying
that they weren't really bad, just confused. Is a pastor's character witness really that
relevant in such a case?
Or for the opposite instance (not strictly atheist related, but in a similar vein) there was
the great deal of reportage on the "Satanic" tattoo of the man who was convicted of dragging
the African-American guy to death. Though I agreed with the conviction, certainly, this made
me very angry because most of the organized racist groups in the south are at least nominally
christian, not satanist, and yet if he'd had a tattoo of a cross or one that said "Jesus Saves" it would hardly have had its photo on CNN.
In general, this sort of thing reaffirms the view that "mainstream" theists, especially
Christians, are somehow more moral and happier people. And, unsurprisingly, those turn out to
be two of the big misperceptions that we deal with here every day.
(It sometimes seems as though the media feels compelled to chant "Christians good, Outsiders
bad" at every opportunity so that they can keep believing it in the face of contrary evidence.)
(Cassandra #297)
Click here to return to master question page.