What do you, as an atheist, think of a media that jumps to accuse someone of having committed a crime due to their being an atheist, especially when it turns out that they aren't?
I think they reflect the interests, desires, and prejudices of the
majority of society. That makes me very sad. (Natalie Ramsey #222)
= He wasn't christian, he wasn't moral.
= For moral leadership, we look to the church.
= If he had religious upbringing, he would have been more moral.
= We should have religion in the schools for moral instructions.
I write letters to the editor whenever I see that. I seem to see less
of it in our local rag now. "You shall not kill," was a rule before it became a part of the 10 commandments. Try telling a xtion that.
(Jerry Sturdivant #1288)
Such incidents also reveal the ignorance of the media - which only mirrors they ignorance of the general public - about atheism. If they understood what it is, they also would understand that it *could not* lead anyone to commit a crime of any description. (George Ricker #146)
Of course when the truth is finally discovered, it never seems to get the same attention from the media, nor is used in the same manner. But then
it doesn't fit in with the "our world's gone to hell because people aren't following Jesus" argument.
But regardless of what the person's beliefs are, they are usually not important, unless the belief/lack of belief played a role in their
actions. Even then, it only will explain what their thought processes
were, and is not indicative of others with the same belief/lack of belief.
It reminds me of revisionist history, it is mockery of the truth to fit someone's warped agenda. A good case in point is the thread about Hitler. Hitler was a theist and an Xian. Some Xians can't deal with this truth,
so on come the revisionists who will go through mental, factual, and historical gymnastics to twist and turn him into an atheist. After all,
no theist (and certainly not an Xian) could be that evil, therefore, he
had to really have been an evil atheist (they have no morals, after all), regardless of what he personally wrote about his beliefs, and regardless
of how it helped shaped some of his "policies". (Keith Brannen #713)
Christianity doesn't want to admit that there is a fundemental flaw in their belief system, and so they find a scape goat. For many centuries
it was Jews and other of different relgions, but it just isn't okay to
use those groups any longer in the era of Political Correctness, and so they tend to go towards those who are still not quite socially accepted, and that would be atheism. It is not deemed politically incorrect or unaceptable to blame the atheists.
The media is not a reliable source in many instances, and that is sad,
but I think it is always a wise choice to question what you are fed
through the media (as well as other places), and not just accept it
because the balding guy in the nice navy suit with the pleasant marroon
tie and the lady with the well manicurred hair said you should. Think
for your self is all I can really say. (Chani #1118)
Click here to return to master question page.