Do you think it is possible that extra-terrestrials ever
visited this planet? Do you think bible passages could be explained that way?
=Do you think bible passages could be explained that way?
Makes as much sense as traditional "explanations," IMO. (Mike Smith #1164)
But, if they were anywere like us *and* not too far in
their science, they sure must have feared our germs.
Whether they visited our planet *in human history* is
a lot less likely.
> Do you think bible passages could be
> explained that way?
YHVH being an alien? Funny hypothesis, but it isn't very
convincing: God is portrayed too much like a barbarian.
But, the hypothesis that Jesus was a time traveller is more funny. There are passages where Jesus shows knowledge of events in another village. (Daneel #323)
Remember that the bible was written by people who would have been impressed by
shiny things. There was a time when a solar eclipse was a great mystery and
surely an omen from some god being upset. The bible was simply somebody
cleaning up and writing down their choice of the legends that were floating
around. The only difference between their legends and Native Americans is that
they are completely human-centric. All of their gods and heroes take human
shape. That is probably why it has lasted so long. People have learned to
devalue animals, nature and even others, but they still highly value
themselves. (ClaySkye #4)
Anything that doesn't violate any natural laws is
"possible". A better question would be to ask whether we
think it is *likely*. And the answer to that question is
no.
> ****************************************************************************
> #182b. Do you think bible passages could be
> explained that way?
> ****************************************************************************
Anything can be offered as an explanation for anything.
A better question would be to ask whether such an
explanation would fit the available evidence better than
other explanations such as actual supernatural events,
poetic propaganda, or mushroom-induced hallucinations.
Well, it works better than the supernatural event
explanation, because extra-terrestrials don't violate any
natural laws. But it doesn't work as well as the poetic
propaganda explanation, because that's a behavior that
has actually been observed in humans. And it doesn't fit
as well as the mushroom hallucination explanation,
because hallucinogenic mushrooms (and their effects) have
also been observed. (Jeff Dee #1355)
Of course, I could be remembering all this wrong and talking out of
my ass... But I do think that we've had bacteria land here that is not
from earth.
As for intelligent life, I have no idea, though I rather doubt that
any religions have been spawned by them. The human tendancy to try to
explain the unknown is enough to explain how we ended up with a bunch of
gods and religions, anyway where the heck did they go? Why wouldn't we
still be slaves of technologically superior masters? If they did show
up they sure didn't leave any signs of their existance here, and we're
definately not their decendants or any of that tripe, or we wouldn't be
so closely related to chimps, cats, etc.
It seems unlikely that intelligent aliens would land and not leave
signs of their existence though, even with a prime directive like on
Star Trek they would have had to have come quite recently for them to
see us as sentient or close to it. Had they come not too long ago there
would have been no intelligent life and they would have had no moral
reason not to colonize. If they did colonize and the colony failed, why
aren't we finding artifacts of their technology?
There are UFO sightings and such, so I imagine they could be amoung
us, studying us, but it seems unlikely. Why would they be altruistic
enough to form a non-interference rule?
So, my final answer is I dunno. (Rian B. Jensen #317)
Sure, it's possible aliens stopped by three billion
years ago and said "there's no life here, let's go"
and the feces they left behind included germs which
became life on Earth. But that's highly unlikely.
How difficult it is for *us* to find planets in other
solar systems, never mind other life, and _then_
couple it with the distance to get there. We've only
put out radio signals for the 100 years and there's
been no detectable source of life before that, so
finding Earth in infinite space would be pure luck.
Within our sight via radio telescopes there is no
known life; even at light speed, the distance to the
nearest undiscovered planet would be longer than all
of human existence, so without any concrete evidence,
the answer is undoubtedly no.
And even if they got here, why didn't they stay? To
start a religion as a cosmic practical joke?
"C'm'ere, Xiphap, look through this telescope! The
idiot humans are *still* building statues of uncle
Xophot! Ha ha ha ha...." (Bob Dog #153)
> Do you think bible passages could be explained that way?
The only one that comes to mind is Eziekiel and the wheel. Again though,
this was all inference and someones interpretation of what they read. Just
like all the different views of religion. (Stalker Steve #1926)
Intelligent extraterrestrial visits before human history: possible;
probability unknown. We have, to date, not seen any evidence that
extraterrestrial intelligence exists, let alone that it's capable of or
interested in visiting our planet.
Intelligent extraterrestrial visits during human history: possible; highly
improbable, based on the lack of preserved signs and artifacts, and other
circumstantial evidence one might expect in the event.
Biblical passages based on visits of extraterrestrial intelligence:
possible, *extremely* improbable. The style of folklore in the Bible is
very similar to folkloric styles from other cultures, *but* very different
in the precise events recounted. Some sections may have a historical basis;
others appear clearly mythic. The theory that the Bibllical text arose as
have numerous other folkloric texts is sufficient to explain them. To
postulate extraterrestrial visits is to unecessarily multiply the number of
postulated entities - and Occam's Razor indicates that we should avoid doing
so.
Of course, all of this is *possible*, in that it contradicts no physical
laws deduced from observed evidence. It's also possible that *I* am an
extraterrestrial in disguise, trying to throw you off the track. But what're
the odds? (Rosa "April" Williams #1723)
Click here to return to master question page.