Would you like to make this site your homepage? It's fast and easy...
Yes, Please make this my home page!
Question 15
What is your political philosophy - liberal, conservative, libertarian, socialist, green, etc.?
- Unrepentant liberal.. I marched for abortion rights, and civil rights,
and against the vietnam war, I vote, always, and occasionally split my ticket but lately the conservatives have been taking over the other party and I have a harder time finding any republicans worth considering.
(Suzane #62)
- My philosophy is to travel what the east calls the middle road. It's
different to sitting on the fence. Thorough(sp?) wrote: "Two roads
verged in the woods and I took the one less travelled by..". Why do
you have to even choose a path though? Travelling the middle road is equivalent to taking neither path but instead taking the "middle road" between the two because it is better than the two options. What it
means is that when you are presented with polarised options you should
take the good from each and eliminate the bad from each. What you're
left with is what (at least in your opinion) constitutes the middle road. Another way of saying it is to seek the truth not acceptance by a particular group. Politics is very superficial (in Australia anyway),
to be honest there aren't many practical differences between our two
main parties (Labour and Liberal) -
however, they are somehow diametrically opposed to each other on any particular issue :)
I'm against all grouping of thinking, all isms and any form of tribalism.
So, in short my political philosophy is individual, I think capitalism,
socialism and anarchy all have strengths and weaknesses but a
combination of the three (or more) would be better than any by themselves.
(NIN #868)
- I think I would classify myself as mostly libertarian with liberal
leanings. I believe that government should stay out of our lives as much
as possible, only inserting itself into the process where individual or
group behaviors have tendencies to infringe on others' ability to exist
and enjoy life. That includes future generations, not just ourselves.
My personal philosophy is "Do no harm" and "You leave me along, I'll
leave you alone". I do not believe in "Turn the other cheek."
I would classify myself as an environmentalist, though not rabid about
it. I consider pollution an infringement upon my individual rights and
have no difficulty justifying draconic measures to remove it. I consider
smoking in my presence an infringement upon my rights not to breath vile,
disgusting, disease causing, malodorous, putrid pollutants, and I won't
hesitate to do something about it. It's the old "your right to swing
your fist ends where my nose begins." Your right to pollute ends where
my right to breath begins. I have asthma and have enough trouble
breathing on my own without anybody else stuffing crap into my lungs.
I'm infuriated by the oil companies' monopoly over transportation
technology and their deliberate suppression of alternative, non-polluting
energy sources.
I consider myself to be an ethical person. My wife complains occasionally
about my unwillingness to bend 'my principles' in certain situations.
My views on religion? Essentially, "leave me alone". If you believe
something ridiculous, fine, but I don't want to hear about it. I've
heard it all before and I don't care. In addition, don't even think
about trying to direct my life and behavior based upon your particular
religious dogma and don't ever try to indoctrinate my children about
that crap in my taxpayer supported public schools. Religious groups
should have no special status, such as they do today. I'm sick of
supporting churches through their tax-exempt status; there's no
difference between a church and a business, as far as I'm concerned.
(Paul J. Koeck, #360)
- I'm a partly reconstructed socialist with Liberal leanings.
(Paul Roberts #49)
- Well, somewhat libertarian, although I think that there are reasonable
uses for a government. So I guess I'm a liberal libertarian who thinks
that a government program may solve the problem, but it depends on the problem. (James A. Hulsey #551)
- I'm very liberal in all areas save capital punishment, which my very
well-developed sense of vengeance makes me a proponent of. The members
of my family range from agnostic to atheist and tend to lean to the left politically, as well. The exception being my brother, who, while atheist, is the Republican sheep of the family. (Alikhat #757)
- Card-carrying member of the Evil Socialist Hoarde of Canada (More commonly known as the New Democratic Party.) (Keith Brannen #713)
- The one I'm nearest to is 'liberal' - but not in the sense used today
in the USA (mainly by republicans). 'Liberal' in Europe doesn't mean socialist in any sense. 'Liberal' is for freedom while also for equal rights to have freedom.
My personal variant excludes group freedom; I think of rights as a momentuous compromise for ensuring equality when the wills of different people are opposed; and I'm worried most liberals are ignorant of the question 'who should have freedom' and take 'humans only' as default.
I don't oppose regulation by state and law totally; but I would
put much more weight on education instead. (Daneel #323)
- Moderate Republican. (Richard Trice #543)
- I'm a political moderate, By which I mean:
I hold some views which could be defined as
'Conservative', but other views I hold could be defined as 'Liberal'.
(pan #1432)
Green Party. (Neal Stein #1984)
- Liberal independent. Not registered with any political party. (chib)
- I would describe myself as a progressive liberal (liberal progressive?). I
dislike labels, because people tend to pigeonhole you. I usually find myself
a bit left of center on most issues, but sometimes I find myself agreeing
with liberatrians and conservatives. It depends on the issue. (John Hachmann#1782 )
- Economically, I'm on the left. Business should be regulated to protect the
interests of the workers. I believe the unfettered free market concentrates
wealth and increases poverty and inequality. I believe the state, if it's
for anything, should be there to speak for the people against the
independent power of capital, and not as currently in the UK and apparently
elsewhere to subsidise already rich corporate interests and hand over public
assets and services to them. It is much cheaper to provide, for example,
free education out of taxes rather than, as is currently planned, to pay
private companies to provide free education AND make a profit, and that's if
the deal is honest and equitable, which none of them are.
On social/personal issues and civil liberties, I'm libertarian. On foreign
issues I'm anti-globalisation of capital and think the IMF, the WTO and the
World Bank should be abolished, as their only purpose appears to be to
prevent poor countries developing their economies in the interests of their
own people and turn them into sweatshops for the rich west. The British
foreign office should stop being the sales force for the arms industry and
promote democracy and human rights instead - and that applies to the rest of
the west as well. (Patrick Brown)
- *puts on flame-proof suit*
Socialist
You asked! ;0P (Nikitta #1759)
- I'm libertarian (with socialist tendencies) - I would really like to
see the IRS building demolished (and then we could support the
employees for a little while). (Alex #2007)
Click here to return to master question page.